The argument goes there aren't many people using the service on Sunday so taxpayers shouldn't help fund them, especially when resources are tight. But you could argue this about all bus services that aren't commercially viable. The problem with restricting subsidy and therefore limiting the scope of a service, you end up subsidising something that fewer and fewer people can use. If a bus only runs on certain days, only a few times a day, doesn't start early enough or doesn't run late, it's only works for small number of people.
But if you invest to make bus services regular and reliable enough for lots of people to use, the subsidy starts to make a real difference.
The problem with the Conservative approach to bus subsidy is they don't believe in it. If you can't afford to run a car (or even two cars), you shouldn't live here. If you want better access to jobs, college or apprenticeships, move. If you're too young or medically unfit to drive, take a taxi or get a lift. If you want better leisure and shopping, you picked the wrong place to live. Things are as they are and let's keep it that way.
Liberal Democrats see things differently.
New housing is being built in Shefford and across Central Bedfordshire. As communities expand, they need more amenities like leisure and retail. It isn't possible to build these in every place, so making sure people can get between our local amenities and towns is even more important.
Same goes for job opportunities; people increasingly need to travel to access the opportunities this county offers. It doesn't make sense for someone to be on benefits or miss out on the perfect job because the lack of a bus service means they can't get to where the jobs are. Is it right that the opportunities for someone who can't drive for whatever reason (age, medical, money etc.) should be so vastly different to those who can.
As our communities expand, road and parking infrastructure (particularly at our local train stations) gets put under increasing pressure. One solution is to tarmac over more land. The other is to invest in a regular, reliable network of bus travel. It's a choice.
And we must make sure we support the vulnerable in our community, those who aren't big enough in number to be heard, but are the most in need: disabled, elderly and low earners.
All of this isn't just about bus services, it's also about other things like broadband and mobile signal. Living in a rural area doesn't have to mean accepting poor infrastructure. And that is why the Liberal Democrat Manifesto pledges to:
- Introduce a new Young Person’s Bus Discount Card, for young people aged 16–21, giving a two-thirds discount on bus travel – allowing young people to access education, apprenticeships, and work.
- Halt the decline in bus services and carry out a review of bus funding and bus policies. We will give principal local authorities the power to run, commission, and regulate the bus network in their area.
- Ensure that every property in the UK is provided, by 2022, with a superfast broadband connection with a download speed of 30Mbps, an upload speed of 6Mbps, and an unlimited usage cap.
- Invest £2 billion in innovative solutions to ensure the provision of high speed broadband across the rural UK, working with local authorities and providing grants to help areas replicate the success of existing community-led projects.
- Work with Ofcom to ensure that mobile phone companies provide fast and reliable coverage in rural areas.
- Work with local authorities to deliver a significant increase in social and affordable housing in rural areas.
Published and promoted on behalf of Lisa French, Daniel Norton and the Liberal Democrats by Annabel Woolmer of 2 Washington Avenue, Shefford, SG17 5XZ and Susan Goodchild of 21 Roslyn Way, Houghton Regis, LU5 6JX.